Monday, February 06, 2006

Monday Class Notes from 2/6: Sacred Victims & Nationalism

In War is a force, Hedges writes that "war finds its meaning in death" (144). We discussed the ways that war, for Hedges, is linked through the initial loss of victims deemed crucial to the cause. Since death is always linked to ideas and ideals of the sacred, or the religious, the deaths of war's first victims become indeliably linked to the war itself. This has the effect of creating an environment where criticizing the war is equivelent to criticizing the dead (p.145). As a class and as individuals, we will have to find ways to discuss war without trivializing the dead or those fallen soldiers who, perhaps later, sacrificed their lives for the cause. The situation is not either/or; it is acutely complex.

Although we didn't get the opportunity to elaborate or expand on his ideas, we also briefly touched on Hedges concept of "nationalist triumphalism" (p.45).

On Wednesday, I hope to explore that idea further, including notions of the "easy way" (45), "collective amensia" (46), the "creation myth" (47), and the individual examples of Slavica (48) and Fejzic (52).

I also hope to finally touch on "nihilistic relativism," from Ch 6 (150).

Monday Class Notes from 2/6: Myth-Makers, The 'Other', & Information Resources

Review of terms from last week:

myth/ mythmakers -- A partial list of the myth-makers we discussed in class today were government(s), the press and media, authors, artists, and family/personal memory. Each of these myth-makers function differently. A family, for instance, could pass down stories, and in the process exagerrate or change those stories. Authors and artists can offer a symbolic commentary on the events and narratives of war. By symbolic, we mean that the artist and the author can use language that is more flexible than so-called 'objective' speech, and thus create meaning differently.

the other -- This is a loaded, kind of catch-all term for those persons or people who are, to varying degrees and consequences, 'different' than 'us.' On the one hand, the term can be an extreme way to categorize someone as enemy or opponent. On the other hand, the term might also be used to define someone with different interests. By interests, we might mean lifestyle, point of view, belief system, or, as one person put it, someone with a different 'future'.

One interesting intersection of the 'other' and mythmaking falls under the schema called ideology. We defined ideology as a real system of living, a lifestyle, that we don't question or that we take for granted. Ideologies are often things a given culture doesn't often consider, but which in fact define and create how that culture works and lives. For instance, here at Queens college we're all basically interested in finding professional careers after college. This same desire is typical among most Americans: make good money, find an attractive husband or wife, and retire early, rich and content. The fact is, these goals and desires are both real and constructed, even arbitrary. 100 years ago, most Americans lived on farms and worked toward the seasonal harvest. 100 years from now, most of us will live on Mars and only eat Snickers. The point is, the life you live today is entirely depedent on the system of beliefs you take for granted while living it. According to some definitions, this is ideology at work.

This concept of ideology intersects with the 'other' by allowing us define some persons as non-persons, as people that somehow fall outside our capacity to understand them. Through language, landscape, or belief, some people find it hard to empathize with persons who clearly exist in a reality differing significantly from their own. This, too, is part of ideology, since ideology seems to limit what kinds of people fall under the category of 'other.'

War is a special and unique time to examine and see ideology at work in a culture or society. Even those aspects of our culture we expect to remain neutral, like the press and media, fall under the spell of war. During war, Hedges writes in War is a force, "the press wanted to be used" (143). For us, this reflects the fact that war is a business that drives ratings, and the individual journalists in the field are ultimately reporting to their ratings-hungry bosses, as well as the military that keep them charged and safe. This role contradicts our expectations of the news and journalism, which we expect to be objective and keep us informed about how to make personal decisions. One of the most important decisions we can make is about whether or not to support violence against other human beings: war.

In order to get better information, we need to examine different sources of information. We could, for instance, read more than one newspaper, or read different magazines. The problem, however, is that these publications all purport to tell the 'truth,' which we know to be influenced by ratings or pressures from revenue sources. It's also very similiar stylistically. In newspapers and magazines, authors use their single point of view but write in a style meant to convey the truth. This is often misleading.

One way to get better information is, of course, to visit the places you'd like to learn about. In a war, however, this can be dangerous. Instead, we may try to get first-hand information from persons participating in war. This is available through websites, blogs, and, when possible, memoirs, essays, and autobiographies. Although these resources may be lacking 'truth,' they may give us useful and important information.

Monday Class Notes from 2/6: Orders of Business

First, I want to thank you for a good class today. I felt like there was pretty frequent and diverse participation, especially for week two, and the comments themselves were really terrific. I want to encourage the people talking to keep talking, and remind the rest of the class that there are really no wrong answers in this course. Everything is useful, so I hope you feel comfortable enough to offer your ideas as the class develops.

Second, I'd like to remind you about some of the assignments coming up.

On Wednesday, Feb. 8, please remember to bring in the working notes on your interview with an older relative. We're going to use some class time to generate a list of some common 'memories' that may or may not show up from our collective research. I'm also going to ask you to respond to some questions over the weekend, which you will incorporate into the refined version of this assignment due Wednesday, February 15th.

You should all also be planning to attend the exhibition on slavery at the New York Historical Society. A first draft about your experience there will come due on Monday, Febrary 20. The first draft will focus on the following criteria: your interaction with at least one particular area of the exhibition---your engagement with at least two specific objects or pieces from the exhibition---and your experience and thoughts on the museum itself. A broader outline of this assignment will be availble to you, but for now concentrate on getting to the museum, taking notes, and thinking through the experience of what you saw.

Finally, I'm wondering if one the diligent note-takers from the course could be sure I don't miss anything relevant from today's discussion. I'm generating a seperate post here relavant to our class today, but I failed to copy down all of the terms and ideas you offered, and which I thought were terrific. Just keep an eye out for my next post, and if I miss anything, let me know.